From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2018 14:59:41 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 2/2] boot/systemd-boot: new package In-Reply-To: <20181226121856.GG14286@scaer> References: <1545782200-1312-1-git-send-email-james.hilliard1@gmail.com> <1545782200-1312-2-git-send-email-james.hilliard1@gmail.com> <20181226085129.GC14286@scaer> <20181226121856.GG14286@scaer> Message-ID: <20181226145941.7db5c114@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 13:18:56 +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > On 2018-12-26 05:33 -0600, James Hilliard spake thusly: > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 2:51 AM Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > > On 2018-12-26 07:56 +0800, james.hilliard1 at gmail.com spake thusly: > > > > - remove more dependencies checks > > > Why? That was absolutely not necessary. > > Hmm, maybe my test setup is different than yours, it seemed to be > > neccesary to get a succesful compile. My setup where I was getting a > > failure was default everything other than adding the systemd-boot > > package . > > Hm.. I only tested four setups: > > - x86_64, systemd with systemd-boot, external toolchain, > - x86_64, systemd-boot standalone, external toolchain, > - i686, systemd with systemd-boot, external toolchain, > - i686, systemd-boot standalone, external toolchain. Did you collect these as tests for support/testing/ ? :-) Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com