From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 21:27:45 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] libglib2: Bump to version 2.56.3 In-Reply-To: <20181230193432.GA10930@x230> References: <20181207173836.13091-1-petr.vorel@gmail.com> <20181230193432.GA10930@x230> Message-ID: <20181230212745.196c01c3@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:34:33 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote: > > ...gobject-fix-compilation-with-gcc-4.7.patch | 50 ------------------ > > ...compilation-without-F_-S-G-ETPIPE_SZ.patch | 52 ------------------- > > package/libglib2/libglib2.hash | 4 +- > > package/libglib2/libglib2.mk | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 package/libglib2/0003-gobject-fix-compilation-with-gcc-4.7.patch > > delete mode 100644 package/libglib2/0005-gio-fix-compilation-without-F_-S-G-ETPIPE_SZ.patch > > Ping, please. I tried to merge a similar bump a few weeks ago, and it caused massive build failures, so I had to revert. In the mean time, I applied the pkg-config bump, which also caused lots of issues, which have apparently now been all addressed, so it will be a good time to merge a libglib2 bump. However, was this tested with a large number of libglib2 reverse dependencies ? See https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/package/libglib2?id=2694222c3d3663d9fcc55e6cf44a45b74b43793f for details. Did you try to build dbus-glib on the latest master, with the libglib2 bump included ? I would be more convinced with a commit log that provides a defconfig with lots of libglib2 reverse dependencies enabled, with the statement that this defconfig continues to build fine after the libglib2 bump. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com