From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 09:16:47 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 0/4] Support Linux 4.20 In-Reply-To: <87sgycox9n.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <20181231175234.14572-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <87sgycox9n.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20190102091647.319e2c96@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 22:58:44 +0100, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > With 2019.02 becoming our next LTS and 4.20 NOT a LTS release, I wonder > if it would make sense to still default to 4.19.x instead of 4.20.x? Yes, that probably make sense. But in this case, we would need to get in touch with the kernel folks to get the net_tstamp.h fix in -stable. It has the Fixes: tag, but it still hasn't been backported to 4.19-stable. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com