From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:04 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/zbar: switch to linuxtv zbar fork In-Reply-To: <1547380110-7761-1-git-send-email-james.hilliard1@gmail.com> References: <1547380110-7761-1-git-send-email-james.hilliard1@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20190113143504.0fd22fe4@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:48:30 +0800, james.hilliard1 at gmail.com wrote: > From: James Hilliard > > The zbar upstream previously used has been abandoned since 2012. > The linuxtv fork appears to be the most actively maintained fork. > I've resynced patches that wouldn't apply and added a few minor bug fixes. Please try to not use first person sentences in commit log. Also, it would be good to explain why the current patch 0004 is removed. > > Signed-off-by: James Hilliard > --- > ...onf-by-reducing-the-warning-error-checkin.patch | 16 ++--- > ...p-logical-not-operations-into-parentheses.patch | 80 ---------------------- > ...eo-buffers-after-probing-and-request-them.patch | 51 ++++++++++++++ > ...-ENOTTY-errors-when-calling-VIDIOC_S_CROP.patch | 26 +++++++ These patches are not just trivial build fixes. I'd like to see them be submitted upstream. I suggest that you send them to Mauro + the linux-media kernel mailing list in Cc, with some patch prefix such as [PATCH zbar] so that it is clear to what project they apply. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com