From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] Getting run-time / defconfig testing maintainers feedback of failures
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:37:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190206153746.43291101@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANQCQpYBJ05wNamef9ZgdVBruMDUq5pY3x8XixGaww=10ertjw@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Matt,
On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 08:14:37 -0600
Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
> Has there been any ideas or proposals so far for giving more
> visibility to the CI failures? I definitely want to contribute if
> there is something in progress, otherwise here's a proposal..........
>
> One idea I had been throwing around was since you can personally fork
> Buildroot in Gitlab and have your own personal Gitlab-runners doing
> the CI builds. Once the per job trigger series[1] merges, I'd like to
> proposed adding a manual section which talks about the following
> 1) How a user can setup a Buildroot fork on Gitlab
> 2) Enable it to follow the main Gitlab Buildroot repo
> 3) Create cron jobs for their test cases
> 4) Manage notifications to track build failures
> 5) Notes on Gitlab-runner setup
>
> This doesn't replace the main CI testing and reporting, however it
> would put more ownership of defconfigs/run-time test fixing on others.
My idea, which puts less burden on the shoulder of individual
contributors is to extend the daily-mail script [1] that is used today
to send autobuilder results. The extension would consist in using the
Gitlab CI API to analyze the results of the last pipelines, and if
there's a failure on a defconfig or test, mail the corresponding
person. Thanks to this, we would have a single mail per day sent out
(to the mailing list and to participants) with autobuilder failures and
gitlab CI failures.
What do you think ?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-06 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-06 14:14 [Buildroot] [RFC] Getting run-time / defconfig testing maintainers feedback of failures Matthew Weber
2019-02-06 14:37 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-02-06 14:48 ` Matthew Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190206153746.43291101@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox