From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/swupdate: fix static build without lua
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 22:43:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307224345.4336952c@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190304214720.13703-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
Hello Fabrice,
On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 22:47:20 +0100
Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/package/swupdate/0001-Makefile-fix-static-build.patch b/package/swupdate/0001-Makefile-fix-static-build.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..56901f9871
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/swupdate/0001-Makefile-fix-static-build.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +From 15a324f8c67548f219256a5a75ba8123cc5bdac6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
> +Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:51:36 +0100
> +Subject: [PATCH] Makefile: fix static build
> +
> +Don't build and install lua_swupdate.so if HAVE_LUA isn't set to y
> +otherwise build will fail if the toolchain only suports building static
> +libraries
> +
> +Fixes:
> + - http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/c11c4d26983e0347d96f3dda62e6d72b031967bb
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
> +[Upstream status: https://github.com/sbabic/swupdate/pull/49]
> +---
> + Makefile | 12 +++++++++---
> + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> +index cfeb9a6..cac99b5 100644
> +--- a/Makefile
> ++++ b/Makefile
> +@@ -369,11 +369,15 @@ tools-bins := $(patsubst $(tools-y)/%.c,$(tools-y)/%,$(wildcard $(tools-y)/*.c))
> + tools-bins-unstr:= $(patsubst %,%_unstripped,$(tools-bins))
> + tools-all := $(tools-objs)
> +
> ++ifeq ($(HAVE_LUA),y)
> ++lua_swupdate := lua_swupdate.so
> ++endif
I am a bit confused. How could lua_swupdate.so build at all (even in
shared library configurations) when HAVE_LUA is not enabled ?
I see the patch has been applied upstream, so I guess it is correct,
but still that confuses me a bit. Or maybe lua_swupdate.so doesn't link
with Lua ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-07 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-04 21:47 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/swupdate: fix static build without lua Fabrice Fontaine
2019-03-04 22:58 ` James Hilliard
2019-03-07 21:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-03-08 18:19 ` Fabrice Fontaine
2019-03-26 23:01 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-03-28 9:53 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190307224345.4336952c@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox