Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2] ppsh compatible Qt5 configuration
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 15:22:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190309152204.38e20094@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190309141022.13140-1-anaumann@ultratronik.de>

Hello Andreas,

On Sat,  9 Mar 2019 15:10:20 +0100
Andreas Naumann <anaumann@ultratronik.de> wrote:

> you were asking for ideas on "Making the Qt5 packaging compatible with
> per-package folder". Lately I had some time to look into it and came up
> with the following patches. Basically they use a custom qt.conf to manipulate
> qmakes builtin pathes. Details are in the commit-messages.
> 
> I did a compile test with almost all qt5 modules available, as well as other
> buildroot provided qt5 applications. At the moment I dont have equipment for
> runtime tests. As far as I could see the install procedure now works as
> expected, no more failures.
> Unfortunately webengine and webkit-example failed sometime during the build
> but it seems that these were unrelated issues.

Thanks a lot for looking into this!

However, there is one thing that this doesn't seem to address: the
installation part.

Currently, the staging installation is just:

	make install

with no DESTDIR/INSTALL_ROOT, and therefore for the target
installation, we have to manually install libraries, QML files and
other stuff, which is really annoying to maintain. Ideally, we would
like Qt5 to behave like most other packages, and do:

	make INSTALL_ROOT=$(STAGING_DIR) install

for the staging installation, and:

	make INSTALL_ROOT=$(TARGET_DIR) install

for the target installation. This change is not strictly needed for
per-package host/target directories, but I really would like to take
the opportunity of changing all this Qt5 logic to also address this
related problem.

I had prepared something like this:
https://github.com/tpetazzoni/buildroot/commit/05e776abf531319a749f5a7d65f265979ea6c4ab,
but I don't remember if it was working completely or not.

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-09 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-09 14:10 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2] ppsh compatible Qt5 configuration Andreas Naumann
2019-03-09 14:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] qt5base: Fix inconsistencies when overriding qmake properties Andreas Naumann
2019-03-09 14:10 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] qt5: Prepare qmake for per-package infrastructure Andreas Naumann
2019-03-09 14:22 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-03-10 14:57   ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2] ppsh compatible Qt5 configuration Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-03-11 11:17     ` Andreas Naumann
2019-03-11 13:06       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-03-11 13:45         ` Andreas Naumann
2019-03-10 16:06   ` Yann E. MORIN
2019-03-11 11:16     ` Andreas Naumann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190309152204.38e20094@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox