From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:49:07 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 02/13] qt5: Convert to generic target install command In-Reply-To: <269608ba-7e70-ca69-b0c8-52fb70dfae26@andin.de> References: <20190314094024.1961-1-anaumann@ultratronik.de> <20190314094024.1961-3-anaumann@ultratronik.de> <20190314111311.48cda006@windsurf> <580bc2fc-615a-f200-0428-1096d2dcdf63@mind.be> <20190314120610.4ee82dd9@windsurf> <269608ba-7e70-ca69-b0c8-52fb70dfae26@andin.de> Message-ID: <20190314144907.22c81f6f@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:35:39 +0100 Andreas Naumann wrote: > Ok, I oversaw this because I was focused on ppsh, where it is much less > of a problem. Indeed. > After my original post, I tried very hard to tweak qt.conf to help us > here without the need for patching the generated Makefiles. First it > looked promising but unfortunately it seem that it's not possible to > install into a temporary sysroot because it automoatically is used to > pull -I includes from. Yeah, I also tried quite hard to make the installation with INSTALL_ROOT work properly, but couldn't find a good solution. > > So my point is: using this pattern for a few packages is a good step > > in that direction, because it teaches us something about the > > implications. > > My personal impression is, that it might be less "huge" after having > converted to per-package staging. The thing is that per-package directories is going to remain optional for a bit of time. It is a fairly radical change, probably going to break a bunch of things. So we'll have to live with the two possibilities (per-package disabled, per-package enabled) for at least a few release I believe. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com