From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] package/libcamera: Add libcamera package
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 22:55:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190403225528.4d00a4c8@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190403112902.29930-1-kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Hello Kieran,
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:29:02 +0700
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> http://libcamera.org/
I've applied to master, with a few minor changes.
First, our canonical commit title for new packages is:
package/foo: new package
> diff --git a/package/libcamera/Config.in b/package/libcamera/Config.in
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cc5e84424c38
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/libcamera/Config.in
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_LIBCAMERA
> + bool "libcamera"
> + depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP
> + depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS
> + # C++11 + https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316
> + depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_5
> + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_UDEV
> + help
> + libcamera provides a software stack to support
> + complex devices that need heavy hardware image
> + processing operations.
> +
> + http://www.libcamera.org/
The indentation of the URL should have been one tab + two spaces.
More importantly (and that was the only thing really missing): the
Config.in comment that describes the dependencies was missing.
> diff --git a/package/libcamera/libcamera.hash b/package/libcamera/libcamera.hash
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7d5392dde2bb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/libcamera/libcamera.hash
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +sha256 2c01dc76d98ef257660f8ef3f4f17f042e112b5eca6b364ad615220c96fbd066 libcamera-d5ca33f6c7b0cd1ca20ec5dc7131aeedf1503080.tar.gz
> +sha256 8177f97513213526df2cf6184d8ff986c675afb514d4e68a404010521b880643 licenses/gnu-gpl-2.0.txt
> +sha256 592987e8510228d546540b84a22444bde98e48d03078d3b2eefcd889bec5ce8c licenses/gnu-lgpl-2.1.txt
> +
Unneeded empty new line that was causing a check-package warning.
Thanks for this contribution! Great to see libcamera moving forward!
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-03 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-03 11:29 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] package/libcamera: Add libcamera package Kieran Bingham
2019-04-03 11:32 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-04-03 18:23 ` Kieran Bingham
2019-04-03 20:38 ` Yann E. MORIN
2019-04-03 20:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-04-04 3:53 ` Kieran Bingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190403225528.4d00a4c8@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox