From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 16:13:25 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Revert "package/gettext-tiny: bump version to add --template option" In-Reply-To: <20190407135543.GO2659@scaer> References: <20190407073708.11205-1-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <20190407151147.02ada3fa@windsurf> <20190407135543.GO2659@scaer> Message-ID: <20190407161325.1d37e578@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:55:43 +0200 "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > I think that, ideally, we would like to have: > - libintl headers that expose the same API as those from GNU gettext, > - a libintl (probably a static one) that exposes just stub functions. Is this actually needed ? All of glibc, musl and uclibc provide libintl.h, and a dummy implementation of libintl functions. We only need the full-blown gettext on the target to provide libintl with real functionality when NLS=y and uclibc/musl is used. But other than that, when !NLS, the stub implementation in musl/uclibc is fine, no ? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com