From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 22:40:14 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC 1/1] package/[wpe]webkit[gtk]: common config BR2_PACKAGE_WEBKIT_ARCH_SUPPORT[_JIT] In-Reply-To: <20190330101940.25868-2-francois.perrad@gadz.org> References: <20190330101940.25868-1-francois.perrad@gadz.org> <20190330101940.25868-2-francois.perrad@gadz.org> Message-ID: <20190413224014.7966e180@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Fran?ois, On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:19:40 +0100 Francois Perrad wrote: > Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad > --- > package/midori/Config.in | 4 ++-- > package/webkitgtk/Config.in | 8 ++++---- > package/webkitgtk/webkitgtk.mk | 2 +- > package/wpewebkit/Config.in | 36 +++------------------------------- > package/wpewebkit/wpewebkit.mk | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) Thanks for this alternate proposal, but after discussing with Yann and Arnout on IRC, the three of us agreed that we didn't like seeing one package defining options that don't match this package name, and then have those options re-used by another package. We are also not entirely convinced by Adrian's proposal either. Arnout is going to reply separately about this. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com