Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC 1/1] toolchain-external/Config.in: Allow to select custom external-toolchain package
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:57:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190415085724.0528c3f7@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0ea00e5-8b75-807d-a1cd-245cd3bd080d@mind.be>

Hello,

On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 23:39:38 +0200
Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:

> > +config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_OTHER
> > +	bool "Other"
> > +	help
> > +	  Use this option to use a external toolchain from custom package
> > +	  (e.g. in external project).  
> 
>  So, the idea is to extend the choice with toolchains that come from
> BR2_EXTERNAL and that you can't select here, right? And you need something like
> that because it's a choice, and there's no way to extend the choice in a
> different Kconfig file.
> 
>  I think this is a worthwhile idea, so I'd like to work it out a little more...
> Adding Yann in Cc since he like that kind of external craziness :-)
> 
>  If kept like this, then I think you should make it depend on a new (blind)
> BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_OTHER_AVAILABLE option, and that an external toolchain
> package should select that option. This way, the option is only available if
> your external tree actually makes one available.
> 
>  Also, it should be documented in docs/manual/customize-outside-br.txt.
> 
>  However, it's still pretty inconvenient for the user. So perhaps we could
> explicitly extend the external infra to generate a .br2-external.toolchain.in
> that is included from here. This file would be populated based on the file
> toolchain/Config.in in the external.
> 
>  Thomas, is that idea over-engineered?

It is over-engineered, but there is not much choice if we want to allow
implementing external toolchains in BR2_EXTERNAL, which would
definitely be useful.

The downside of Vadim's approach is that it limits the BR2_EXTERNAL to
implementing only one external toolchain, since it's only adding one
entry to the choice. Your approach would be more flexible.

Best regards,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-15  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-14 21:26 [Buildroot] [RFC 1/1] toolchain-external/Config.in: Allow to select custom external-toolchain package Vadim Kochan
2019-04-14 21:39 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-04-15  6:57   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-04-15  8:54     ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-04-15 17:15       ` Yann E. MORIN
2019-04-16  6:01         ` Vadim Kochan
2019-04-16 20:11           ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190415085724.0528c3f7@windsurf \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox