From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Vorel Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:20:51 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] ltp-testsuite: Fix uClibc build with disabled fts.h support In-Reply-To: <20190421123611.4016cc04@windsurf> References: <20190417135458.15505-1-Nikita.Sobolev@synopsys.com> <20190421123611.4016cc04@windsurf> Message-ID: <20190422172050.GA18445@dell5510> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Thomas, > I am confused, because the current ltp-testsuite package seems to build > properly with uClibc that doesn't have FTS support enabled. I just > built the following configuration: > BR2_arm=y > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_CUSTOM=y > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_DOWNLOAD=y > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_URL="http://autobuild.buildroot.org/toolchains/tarballs/br-arm-full-2019.02-rc1.tar.bz2" > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_GCC_4_9=y > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_HEADERS_4_14=y > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_LOCALE=y > # BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_HAS_THREADS_DEBUG is not set > BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_CXX=y > BR2_INIT_NONE=y > BR2_SYSTEM_BIN_SH_NONE=y > # BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX is not set > BR2_PACKAGE_LTP_TESTSUITE=y > # BR2_TARGET_ROOTFS_TAR is not set > It has FTS disabled: > $ grep FTS output/staging/usr/include/bits/uClibc_config.h > #undef __UCLIBC_HAS_FTS__ > And it builds perfectly fine. Thanks for a research (I'll do more testing next time, not just reviewing)! Actually testing it, it's really ok, due these lines in package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk: # Requires uClibc fts and bessel support, normally not enabled ifeq ($(BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC),y) define LTP_TESTSUITE_REMOVE_UNSUPPORTED rm -rf $(@D)/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/ rm -rf $(@D)/testcases/misc/math/float/bessel/ rm -f $(@D)/testcases/misc/math/float/float_bessel.c endef LTP_TESTSUITE_POST_PATCH_HOOKS += LTP_TESTSUITE_REMOVE_UNSUPPORTED endif We can either remove deleting testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/ as part of this patchset, or simply wait for next update (planning for the start of the second week in the May [1]), I'd remove it during the update. Kind regards, Petr [1] http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2019-April/011729.html