From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 09:04:52 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] Add libvirt (KVM) support In-Reply-To: References: <20190215173607.13773-1-christopher@lecroq.be> <20190413222137.6c0cba37@windsurf> <76055cea-ec05-aad3-1f27-39e07b48b12b@lecroq.be> <25259681-75b6-fe4b-bb4b-e9a903f48058@mind.be> Message-ID: <20190527090452.6124a023@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sun, 26 May 2019 22:14:54 +0200 Angelo Compagnucci wrote: > The only thing that bothers me is that the debian images for vagrant > are not official and only maintained by a single person > (https://app.vagrantup.com/debian). > On the contrary, Ubuntu images are officially maintained by canonical > into their efforts for ubuntu on cloud. > > Alternatively we can switch to Fedora which is officially supported > and supports libvirt, but we have to completetly rewrite the provision > section of the vagrantfile. Do we really need to make a choice here ? For Docker, our intention is to have several Dockerfiles for different distributions, in support/docker/. What about having several Vagrantfiles, in support/vagrant/, also to support different distributions ? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com