From: Thomas Huth <huth@tuxfamily.org>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/netsurf: disallow on archs requiring ABI specific CFLAGS
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2019 07:33:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190601073351.4bf75739@thl530.multi.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190531214052.14297-1-peter@korsgaard.com>
Am Fri, 31 May 2019 23:40:52 +0200
schrieb Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>:
> Fixes:
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/67ef520d82ea529a9fe593d83a3aeae5f8b0ee5d/
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/eafc3e4be571d5ecee549a11530ac4e508f31782/
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ba7f30833fef54162a82f4b336a72d6599594526/
>
> The netsurf build system mixes up host and target CFLAGS, so it isn't
> compatible with architectures where we pass ABI specicif compiler
s/specicif/specific/ please.
> flags (in TARGET_ABI).
>
> Add a _ARCH_SUPPORTS kconfig variable matching the TARGET_ABI logic
> we have in package/Makefile.in, and use it to disallow netsurf for
> those architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <peter@korsgaard.com>
> ---
> package/netsurf/Config.in | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/package/netsurf/Config.in b/package/netsurf/Config.in
> index 30b2695309..4f7d5c2713 100644
> --- a/package/netsurf/Config.in
> +++ b/package/netsurf/Config.in
> @@ -1,10 +1,20 @@
> +# netsurf mixes up host and target CFLAGS, so it isn't compatible
> with +# architectures where we pass ABI specific compiler flags
> (TARGET_ABI) +config BR2_PACKAGE_NETSURF_ARCH_SUPPORTS
> + bool
> + default y if !((BR2_arc && BR2_ARC_ATOMIC_EXT) || \
> + BR2_powerpc_8540 || BR2_powerpc_8548 ||
> BR2_powerpc_e500mc || \
> + BR2_xtensa)
> +
> comment "netsurf needs a toolchain w/ dynamic library"
> depends on BR2_STATIC_LIBS
> + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_NETSURF_ARCH_SUPPORTS
First, the comment is now not accurate anymore. It should also say
something about the architectures where it is not available.
Then the logic below says that PACKAGE_NETSURF depends on "!STATIC_LIBS
*AND* NETSURF_ARCH_SUPPORT". The dependency of the comment above is
inverted, so I think this rather should be:
depends on BR2_STATIC_LIBS || !BR2_PACKAGE_NETSURF_ARCH_SUPPORTS
?
> config BR2_PACKAGE_NETSURF
> bool "netsurf"
> # static linking support is broken beyond repair
> depends on !BR2_STATIC_LIBS
> + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_NETSURF_ARCH_SUPPORTS
> select BR2_PACKAGE_EXPAT
> select BR2_PACKAGE_JPEG
> select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBICONV if !BR2_ENABLE_LOCALE
Thomas H
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-01 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-31 21:40 [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/netsurf: disallow on archs requiring ABI specific CFLAGS Peter Korsgaard
2019-06-01 5:33 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2019-06-01 7:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-06-01 7:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-06-01 8:15 ` Peter Korsgaard
2019-06-06 15:38 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190601073351.4bf75739@thl530.multi.box \
--to=huth@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox