From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 19:28:12 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/1] package/python-periphery: new package In-Reply-To: <1561055893-22140-1-git-send-email-pjtexier@koncepto.io> References: <1561055893-22140-1-git-send-email-pjtexier@koncepto.io> Message-ID: <20190622192812.3abffc71@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 20:38:13 +0200 Pierre-Jean Texier wrote: > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Jean Texier > --- > Changes v1 -> v2 > - remove 'v' prefix in PYTHON_PERIPHERY_VERSION > > Scanpy was not used because the archive in pythonhosted > does not contain the license file. > > With the github repo : make python-periphery-legal-info > >>> python-periphery 1.1.1 Collecting legal info > LICENSE: OK (sha256: db1bea825e728d8bcdf6c220d79c74370a9fcb63a4f9153c2cece2b63e177aa4) > > DEVELOPERS | 1 + > package/Config.in | 1 + > package/python-periphery/Config.in | 7 +++++++ > package/python-periphery/python-periphery.hash | 3 +++ > package/python-periphery/python-periphery.mk | 13 +++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 package/python-periphery/Config.in > create mode 100644 package/python-periphery/python-periphery.hash > create mode 100644 package/python-periphery/python-periphery.mk Applied to master, thanks. It would be good to notify upstream that the LICENSE file is missing in the "official" tarball available from PyPi. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com