From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 10:40:56 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 15/15] package/gcc: enable gcc 9.1 for ork1 (openrisc) In-Reply-To: References: <20190620100725.105587-1-giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> <20190620100725.105587-16-giulio.benetti@micronovasrl.com> <54fe6b56-aa43-b657-0b8e-1c42e2471735@mind.be> Message-ID: <20190714084056.GI2680@scaer> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Guo, All, On 2019-07-14 07:57 +0800, Guo Ren spake thusly: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:24 AM Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > > On 20/06/2019 12:07, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > > openrisc support has been added with gcc 9.1. > > > Keep for now the old gcc 5 fork for ork1. > > So, when will we remove this? > > Same for ARC (GCC 8.x fork) and C-SKY (GCC 6.x fork): they are available in > > GCC9, do we need to keep those old forks? > Keep the fork for C-SKY, the upstream of csky backend in gcc9 only > support abiv2. As far as I can see, we have no way to choose the ABI in Buildroot. So, what would we loose by keeping only gcc-9? Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'