From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/lxc: switch from gnutls to openssl
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 11:32:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190728093235.GA21875@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190727224246.75bd967e@windsurf>
Thomas, Fabrice, J?r?me, All,
On 2019-07-27 22:42 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 18:50:40 +0200
> Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Fixes:
> > - http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/c0a9565ae65336d55cdedc67adff221a7fa1a2c8
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks, but this is not entirely convincing, for two reasons:
>
> - The actual build failure is due to libgnutls.so using __atomic
> built-ins, without being linked to libatomic.so. This is a problem
> that can affect any other package that uses libgnutls.so (and a
> question is why we're not seeing more failures like this, from other
> packages that use libgnutls).
>
> - Switching to openssl is certainly OK, but the lxc configure.ac logic
> does just OPENSSL_LIBS='-lssl -lcrypto', which is pretty much
> guaranteed to fail in static linking scenarios, as it doesn't
> account for second-order dependencies of openssl (the classic -lz
> missing).
>
> Could you have a look at the libgnutls.so/libatomic.so issue, and
> double check if lxc/openssl builds fine in a static linking
> configuration ? For the latter, it is possible that lxc already depends
> on libz for another reason, in which case the problem will not be
> visible.
Although I agree with Thomas' review, we'll nonetheless have to
understand and/or fix the -lz issue when we next bump lxz, as that new
version *will* have switched to using openssl instead of gnutls anyway.
So I would say that, barring a good explanations about the atomic issue,
this backport from upstream is good-enough (with -lz fixed/explained).
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-28 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-05 16:50 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/lxc: switch from gnutls to openssl Fabrice Fontaine
2019-07-27 20:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-07-28 9:32 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2019-07-28 21:20 ` Fabrice Fontaine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190728093235.GA21875@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox