From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 13:35:41 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] pppd: use uclibc libcrypt instead of openssl In-Reply-To: <20190906101849.4621-1-alexander.i.mukhin@gmail.com> References: <20190906101849.4621-1-alexander.i.mukhin@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20190906133541.5707ade0@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Alexander, On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 13:18:49 +0300 Alexander Mukhin wrote: > If building with uclibc, fall back to using its cryptographic routines > instead of openssl. This removes unnecessary dependence. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Mukhin I am surprised: which functions are provided by uClibc that glibc doesn't provide ? Also, what about the musl C library that we support ? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com