Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/libssh: add support for mbedtls crypto backend
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:22:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190923092218.72ad7121@windsurf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKpO6uFOE2ShN1JupQoiupNF-SVnWzMiJ5x9twcAueGG5p9how@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:11:40 +0300
Mircea Gliga <gliga.mircea@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Thomas and thanks for the review,
> 
> The Config.in also has this part that automatically selects the OpenSSL
> package if no crypto backend is already available:
> 
> > -       select BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL if !BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGCRYPT
> > +       select BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL if !(BR2_PACKAGE_MBEDTLS ||  
> BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGCRYPT)
> 
> This is in sync with the old behavior, when mbedtls was not in scope.
> And then in case there are multiple crypto backends available it will
> prefer Libgcrypt, then OpenSSL and in the end mbedTLS:
> 
> > +     default BR2_PACKAGE_LIBSSH_LIBGCRYPT if BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGCRYPT
> > +     default BR2_PACKAGE_LIBSSH_OPENSSL if BR2_PACKAGE_OPENSSL
> > +     default BR2_PACKAGE_LIBSSH_MBEDTLS if BR2_PACKAGE_MBEDTLS  
> 
> The default will be to select the first enabled crypto backend provider
> in the same preference order as is used now, i.e. no change from current
> behavior.

Thanks, but that was not my point. My point was: is it really useful to
provide an explicit choice vs. simply selecting a preferred crypto
provider automatically, with no explicit choice in Config.in.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-23  7:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-18 11:06 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/libssh: add support for mbedtls crypto backend Mircea Gliga
2019-09-18 15:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-09-23  6:11   ` Mircea Gliga
2019-09-23  7:22     ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-09-23 10:22       ` Mircea Gliga
2019-09-23 13:31         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-09-23 14:20           ` Mircea Gliga
2019-09-23 15:19             ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2019-09-24 13:26 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] " Mircea Gliga
2019-10-02  5:16   ` Mircea Gliga
2020-02-02 19:36   ` Peter Korsgaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190923092218.72ad7121@windsurf.home \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox