From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 15:33:37 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 09/30] package/musl-fts: new package In-Reply-To: References: <20190922090646.15130-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20190922090646.15130-10-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20190923153337.1e4a2ed0@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:12:17 -0500 Matthew Weber wrote: > > +MUSL_FTS_VERSION = v1.2.7 > > Does it make sense in this case to move the "v" to the SITE like the > other version fix-ups? I checked release monitoring and it doesn't > look like there is an entry yet for this package (ie. no precedence > has been set yet) It makes complete sense to move the "v" to the site of course. My bad, this patch was sitting in a Buildroot branch for quite a while, and I didn't rework it after the "v" cleanup in all other Buildroot packages. I'll wait for other comments before sending a v2 (which would be another 22 patches sent on the mailing list), unless someone applies my patch and does the fix. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com