From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 22:28:13 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] package/libkrb5: Bumb to 1.17 In-Reply-To: <20190930221815.6d06ffcb@windsurf.home> References: <20190930113931.9654-1-nerv@dawncrow.de> <20190930221815.6d06ffcb@windsurf.home> Message-ID: <20190930202813.GA10860@scaer> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thomas, All, On 2019-09-30 22:18 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 13:39:31 +0200 > Andr? Hentschel wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Andr? Hentschel [--SNIP--] > However, I think this package license information may not be totally > correct, independently of this version bump. Indeed, our libkrb5.mk > says the license is MIT, but the NOTICE file shows a bunch of parts > under BSD-2-Clause for example. > > Arnout, Yann, what do you think about this? It's one of those packages > with lots of code re-used from different projects, all under > MIT/BSD-2-Clause style licenses. I'd be interested to hear your opinion > on the matter. Looking at the haorball the NOTICE file is, I would be tempted to just state: LIBKRB5_LICENSE = Kerberos license and be done with it. Let the user sort the mess on their side... Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'