From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:15:29 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/libopenssl: fix static build on x86_64 In-Reply-To: <20191015214644.31476-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> References: <20191015214644.31476-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20191016091529.5a03c63b@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 23:46:44 +0200 Fabrice Fontaine wrote: > Use no-asm when building statically on x86_64, see > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/9839 > > Fixes: > - http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/e4f04bb13ec1b82b73db645bea4933e52bca4185 > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine Is the problem specific to x86-64 ? Reading the Github issue, the OpenSSL developer apparently says that whenever the "generic" architecture variants are used, no-asm should be passed as well. This is not really what your patch is doing. Could you clarify this ? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com