From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:31:55 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC PATCH 4/4] package/qt5/qt5base: support ti-sgx-libgbm In-Reply-To: References: <20191015213101.27460-1-lothar.felten@gmail.com> <20191015213101.27460-4-lothar.felten@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20191016093155.06dcd8b3@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 01:00:37 +0200 Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > Note that there was also talk about making gbm a virtual package (with > currently mesa3d and ti-sgx-libgbm as providers). IIRC, though, the TI gbm > package was not 100% compatible. But apparently it's good enough to build qt5 then? I tried to make libgbm a virtual package, but unfortunately my conclusion was that the libgbm API is not really standardized. When I tried to build kmscube against the TI gbm, it would fail miserably, and it was also failing with another non-mesa GBM implementation. I pushed what I had back then at https://github.com/tpetazzoni/buildroot/commits/gbm. > Note that we don't require you to figure all of this out before we can apply > these patches. But maybe you know a little bit more about it. Yes, let's not make this depend on having a virtual package for libgbm. We can figure that out later. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com