From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/ltp-testsuite: fix static build with lts-musl
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:05:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191017090518.27cbbe11@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191016222624.GA20069@dell5510>
Hello Petr,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:26:25 +0200
Petr Vorel <petr.vorel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
>
> > So essentially the problem here is that libcpu_set.a uses some FTS
> > functions, but -lfts appears *before* -lcpu_set in the link command
> > line.
> But in the patch bellow -lfts is behind -lcpu_set:
> +-LDLIBS += -lcpu_set -lcontrollers -lltp
> ++LDLIBS += -lcpu_set -lcontrollers -lltp $(FTS_LIBS)
That's what my point is: without the patch from Fabrice, passing some
LDLIBS to ltp-testsuite puts those libraries listed in LDLIBS *before*
the internal ltp-testsuite libraries, which contradicts the
ltp-testsuite documentation for this LDLIBS variable.
What Fabrice's patch does is provide a way to give a list of libraries
that are *really* used after the list of objects/internal libraries.
> /br-test-pkg/br-arm-full-static/host/bin/arm-linux-gcc -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -Os -static -I/br-test-pkg/br-arm-full-static/host/bin/../arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi/sysroot/usr/include/tirpc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -W -Wold-style-definition -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I../../../../../include -I../../../../../include -I../../../../../include/old/ -static -L/br-test-pkg/br-arm-full-static/build/ltp-testsuite-20190930/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_memory_test/../cpuset_lib -L/br-test-pkg/br-arm-full-static/build/ltp-testsuite-20190930/testcases/kernel/controllers/cpuset/cpuset_memory_test/../../libcontrollers -L../../../../../lib cpuset_memory_test.c -L/br-test-pkg/br-arm-full-static/host/bin/../arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi/sysroot/usr/lib -ltirpc -lpthread -lfts -lltp -lcpu_set -lcontrollers -lltp -lpthread -o cpuset_memory_test
See that -lfts is passed, but *before* -lcpu_set ? That's what causes the issue.
> > Petr: is that expected ? What do you suggest ?
> To be honest, I don't know, it looks like a bug. There was some change related
> I need to to dig a bit more into library Makefiles.
> Cyril, do you have any idea?
An option would be in the various Makefiles to do:
LDLIBS := -lrt $(LDLIBS)
instead of:
LDLIBS += -lrt
And similarly for the specific case causing the trouble:
LDLIBS := -lcpu_set -lcontrollers -lltp $(LDLIBS)
instead of the current:
LDLIBS += -lcpu_set -lcontrollers -lltp
Another option is to decide that ltp-testsuite is not available for
static-only builds.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-17 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-14 16:53 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/ltp-testsuite: fix static build with lts-musl Fabrice Fontaine
2019-10-14 20:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-10-16 22:26 ` Petr Vorel
2019-10-17 7:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2019-10-17 7:43 ` Petr Vorel
2019-10-21 20:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-10-21 20:21 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191017090518.27cbbe11@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox