From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/cmake: bump version to 3.15.5
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 10:29:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191103092911.GE2710@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191102223151.115b219b@windsurf.home>
Thomas, All,
On 2019-11-02 22:31 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 11:24:25 +0100
> "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
>
> > On 2019-11-01 22:40 +0100, Bernd Kuhls spake thusly:
> > > Release notes:
> > > https://blog.kitware.com/cmake-3-15-5-available-for-download/
> >
> > Thanks for the poitner to the release notes.
> >
> > Although I understand we usually want to update, the release notes for
> > this version only list one fix to an example file, and fixes for VS
> > (Visual Studio, thus Windows) and Xcode (thus MacOS). So, nothing that
> > applies to Linux, and to us.
> >
> > I don't think we want updates just for the sake of having updates.
> > Bumping a package, especially one that can be considered part of the
> > core components, should bring something besides just bragging about
> > "up-to-date".
>
> I beg to disagree here. Of course, in stable releases or after -rc1 has
> been released, we don't want to see "gratuitous" version bumps.
>
> However, outside of these moments, those gratuitous updates are fine.
> Indeed, they reduce the effort that will be needed for the next "real"
> bump. Indeed, we can very easily check what are the changes between
> 3.15.4 and 3.15.5, but what if we don't update to 3.15.7, 3.15.8,
> 3.15.9 because none of these contain any change that look "useful" ?
> Then when 3.15.10 appears, we have to bump from 3.15.4 to 3.15.10 in
> one go, and review at this point what all the changes were. I very much
> prefer doing incremental bumps.
Right; agreed now.
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-03 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-01 21:40 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/cmake: bump version to 3.15.5 Bernd Kuhls
2019-11-02 9:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-11-02 10:24 ` Yann E. MORIN
2019-11-02 21:31 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-11-03 9:29 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191103092911.GE2710@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox