From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:32:04 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/9] package/rcw: upgrade the rcw version to
 LSDK-19.09
In-Reply-To: <8ef6b0156f54102d837ecfc429ae810d@walle.cc>
References: <20191120040725.32207-1-jerry.huang@nxp.com>
 <20191120040725.32207-2-jerry.huang@nxp.com>
 <8ef6b0156f54102d837ecfc429ae810d@walle.cc>
Message-ID: <20191120103204.19a15798@windsurf.home>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hello,

On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:21:12 +0100
Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:

> > diff --git a/package/rcw/rcw.hash b/package/rcw/rcw.hash
> > index 7de1ec659a..3fbb5d167f 100644
> > --- a/package/rcw/rcw.hash
> > +++ b/package/rcw/rcw.hash  
> 
> sorry for missing the initial commit.. but IMHO the package name "rcw" 
> is _really_ bad. because its too generic. what if another SoC also has a 
> package rcw. So if it is still possible, could it be renamed to 
> rcw-qoriq ?

True, rcw is very short and quite generic. Matt, what do you think?

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com