From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:45:39 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/9] package/rcw: upgrade the rcw version to
 LSDK-19.09
In-Reply-To: <CANQCQpbZdy0q_qvRf8AWKu8wVFTNh8o9fjY7=UDeiKmU8zhnGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20191120040725.32207-1-jerry.huang@nxp.com>
 <20191120040725.32207-2-jerry.huang@nxp.com>
 <8ef6b0156f54102d837ecfc429ae810d@walle.cc>
 <20191120103204.19a15798@windsurf.home>
 <CANQCQpbZdy0q_qvRf8AWKu8wVFTNh8o9fjY7=UDeiKmU8zhnGw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20191120104539.37da1c64@windsurf.home>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 03:38:40 -0600
Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@collins.com> wrote:

> > True, rcw is very short and quite generic. Matt, what do you think?
> 
> Michael, good points, maybe we could append a prefix to make it
> freescale-qoriq-rcw?

Yes, freescale-qorqiq-rcw is good.

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com