From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] autotools, autorefconf, libtoolize and non-existing m4 directory
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:30:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210143024.7b3a8bb6@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4bfdbacb2180b054d3e290355dc1ed8@walle.cc>
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:21:06 +0100
Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
> > This is simple, and works just fine.
>
> Correct, that would work, actually, we already had that construct in the
> recipe. But as I've already said, this behaviour is very different than
> on the host. Esp. if you'd use "aclocal -i"; which I don't know if it is
> used at all. Currently there are many workarounds, all are fine. My
> intention was to make you aware of this bug; or if you already knew it,
> your opinion on it. Eg. aclocal is handling the first include path in a
> special way, but buildroot already occupies that slot.
No, I was not aware that the first include path is handled in a special
way, and that because Buildroot uses that slot, the m4/ directory no
longer gets created automatically.
In fact, aclocal's man page says:
--install
copy third-party files to the first -I directory
So indeed that's I guess how the m4/ directory gets created.
Perhaps we should use:
--system-acdir=DIR
directory holding third-party system-wide files
instead? Could you try that in the definition of $(AUTORECONF), instead
of the -I options?
In fact, it is quite worrying that aclocal -i -I/foo/bar copies stuff
to /foo/bar. Indeed, we clearly don't want aclocal to clutter
$(ACLOCAL_DIR) or $(ACLOCAL_HOST_DIR) with additional files by effect
of running autoreconf.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 10:34 [Buildroot] autotools, autorefconf, libtoolize and non-existing m4 directory Michael Walle
2019-12-10 13:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-12-10 13:21 ` Michael Walle
2019-12-10 13:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210143024.7b3a8bb6@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox