From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 23:19:46 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] support/download/svn: generate reproducible svn archives In-Reply-To: <87zhfiu28h.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <20191222213148.13762-1-heiko.thiery@gmail.com> <20191222223650.1f44d3ca@windsurf> <20191222225727.7e8f88d4@windsurf> <20191223171658.GN26395@scaer> <87zhfiu28h.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20191223231946.3f57ebe1@windsurf> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, +Alex in Cc. Alex, there's an open2300 question for you below. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 23:05:34 +0100 Peter Korsgaard wrote: > > In practice, we have only two: fis and open2300. The other packages that > > may use svn are those where the user would set the version, so they > > would anyway be excluded from the hash check. > > Talking about those two packages, weren't we going to remove them? They > are both very old and haven't been updated since they were added. That's indeed another way. For the "fis" package, I think this is reasonable, as even the use-case is very obsolete (RedBoot stuff). For open2300, I'm not sure. Alex: is open2300 still relevant today? You introduced this package in Buildroot many years ago. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com