From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] package/udisks: bump version to 2.8.4
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 20:07:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200217200744.0190e55e@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200217143030.5031-5-giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 15:30:30 +0100
Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com> wrote:
> Bump to version 2.8.4 of udisks. All patches have been upstremed, so
> drop them all.
Considering the complexity of the bump, it would be nice to have more
details in the commit log.
> diff --git a/package/udisks/Config.in b/package/udisks/Config.in
> index 04a632dd8d..909b3c8bd4 100644
> --- a/package/udisks/Config.in
> +++ b/package/udisks/Config.in
> @@ -4,21 +4,27 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_UDISKS
> depends on BR2_HOST_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9 # spidermonkey
> depends on BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP # spidermonkey
> depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HAS_UDEV
> + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_QEMU_ARCH_SUPPORTS # gobject-introspection
> depends on BR2_PACKAGE_SPIDERMONKEY_ARCH_SUPPORTS # spidermonkey
> - depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9 # spidermonkey
> + depends on BR2_SYSTEM_ENABLE_NLS # volume_key
There is no such dependency in volume_key.
> + depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_GCC_AT_LEAST_4_9 # spidermonkey, gobject-introspection
> depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_NPTL # polkit
> - depends on BR2_USE_MMU # lvm2
> + depends on BR2_USE_MMU # lvm2, gobject-introspection
> depends on BR2_USE_WCHAR # dbus-glib -> glib2
> depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC # polkit, lvm2, parted
> depends on !BR2_STATIC_LIBS # lvm2, spidermonkey
> + depends on BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC
Why is this dependency on glibc needed? Coming from GOI ? Also, it
makes the !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC dependency no longer needed.
In addition, you did not propagate all the dependencies of volume_key I
believe (such as SYNC_4). Could you check this ?
> select BR2_PACKAGE_DBUS
> select BR2_PACKAGE_DBUS_GLIB
> - select BR2_PACKAGE_SG3_UTILS
> - select BR2_PACKAGE_POLKIT
> - select BR2_PACKAGE_PARTED
> - select BR2_PACKAGE_LVM2
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_GOBJECT_INTROSPECTION
> select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBATASMART
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBBLOCKDEV
> select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGUDEV
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_LVM2
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_PARTED
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_POLKIT
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_SG3_UTILS
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_LIBXSLT
Alphabetic ordering would be nice.
> -comment "udisks needs a glibc or musl toolchain with locale, C++, wchar, dynamic library, NPTL, gcc >= 4.9"
> +comment "udisks support needs NLS enabled"
> + depends on !BR2_SYSTEM_ENABLE_NLS
As said above, I don't think that it is true.
> +comment "udisks needs a glibc toolchain with locale, C++, wchar, dynamic library, NPTL, gcc >= 4.9"
> depends on BR2_USE_MMU
> depends on BR2_PACKAGE_SPIDERMONKEY_ARCH_SUPPORTS
> - depends on !BR2_ENABLE_LOCALE || BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_UCLIBC || \
> + depends on BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_QEMU_ARCH_SUPPORTS
> + depends on !BR2_ENABLE_LOCALE || \
> + !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_USES_GLIBC || \
> !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP || \
> BR2_STATIC_LIBS || \
> !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS_NPTL || \
Of course, this will have to be updated.
Overall, it is really crazy. A stupid daemon that manages storage
devices need a Javascript interpreter and GOI.
There was some discussion at
https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/issues/615 about running
udisks without polkit.
Or maybe we need to package https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udevil as an
alternative, but it's not maintained since 2015, so not great at all.
See https://github.com/IgnorantGuru/udevil/commits/master.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-17 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-17 14:30 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] udisks bump to version 2.8.4 Giulio Benetti
2020-02-17 14:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/4] package/libbytesize: add new package Giulio Benetti
2020-04-12 14:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-02-17 14:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/4] package/volume_key: " Giulio Benetti
2020-02-17 18:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-02-18 13:46 ` Giulio Benetti
2020-02-18 14:06 ` Giulio Benetti
2020-02-18 14:47 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-02-20 16:28 ` Giulio Benetti
2020-02-18 14:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-02-18 14:55 ` Giulio Benetti
2020-02-17 14:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/4] package/libblockdev: " Giulio Benetti
2020-02-17 18:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-02-17 14:30 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 4/4] package/udisks: bump version to 2.8.4 Giulio Benetti
2020-02-17 19:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200217200744.0190e55e@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox