From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC v2 2/2] package/qt5webengine: fix chromium arm compile flags
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 09:00:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200303090029.3ab94eef@windsurf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302230155.0b241578@gmx.net>
Hello Peter,
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:01:55 +0100
Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Could we instead ask this thing to not do all this sorcery, and instead
> > just use the compiler as-is, without passing crazy
> > architecture-specific compiler flags ?
>
> Disabled all march/mfloat-abi/mtune/mfpu flags with the following patch:
[...]
Thanks for this work! To me this feels like a better solution, even
though it's annoying to maintain such a local patch. I assume there's
pretty much zero chance to get this merged by upstream Chromium, and
then back into the qt5webengine code anyway.
> Quick (if you call can call it quick with miniumum 50 minutes compile time)
> worked for a buildroot toolchain (which defaults to the right cpu) and
> the rpi zero testcase..., but now no buildroot specific flags are
> used for the compile (no optimize, no custom, no cpu type etc.)...,
> will work with compilers with the right default values...
The CPU type is encoded into the compiler wrapper. So it's really only
the optimization/debug flags that you will be missing.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-03 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-02 9:19 [Buildroot] [RFC v2 1/2] arch/Config.in.arm: add BR2_GCC_TARGET_ARCH entries Peter Seiderer
2020-03-02 9:19 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v2 2/2] package/qt5webengine: fix chromium arm compile flags Peter Seiderer
2020-03-02 13:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-03-02 22:01 ` Peter Seiderer
2020-03-03 8:00 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2020-03-02 10:17 ` [Buildroot] [RFC v2 1/2] arch/Config.in.arm: add BR2_GCC_TARGET_ARCH entries Peter Seiderer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200303090029.3ab94eef@windsurf.home \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox