From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:49:35 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/mbedtls: add BR2_PACKAGE_MBEDTLS_X509_UNSUPPORTED_CRITICAL_EXTENSION In-Reply-To: <20200423202726.GR5035@scaer> References: <20200422192059.790299-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> <20200423220905.06d9dc59@windsurf.home> <20200423202726.GR5035@scaer> Message-ID: <20200423224935.44b7e7ab@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:27:26 +0200 "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > Second, patch 2 does not fix the problem, which is only fixed with patch > 3. Semantically, the last two patches should be reversed: first fix the > problem (use of X.509 extension), then add a feature (choice of > backend). I thought the idea of patch 2 was that it would allow to select the BR2_PACKAGE_MBEDTLS_X509_UNSUPPORTED_CRITICAL_EXTENSION option in patch 3, but indeed, it does not. This makes patch 2 and the whole series even more awkward. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com