From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:21:43 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/mbedtls: add BR2_PACKAGE_MBEDTLS_X509_UNSUPPORTED_CRITICAL_EXTENSION In-Reply-To: References: <20200422192059.790299-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com> <20200423220905.06d9dc59@windsurf.home> <20200423232758.zwos3e5f55pz23ld@einstein.dilieto.eu> <20200424090710.GA5035@scaer> <20200424112639.xdzs4ggqtijcij74@einstein.dilieto.eu> <20200424113226.mhi7l3r46wluyu7v@einstein.dilieto.eu> <20200424114813.GH5035@scaer> <20200424131108.ntkqvq7dlwgbsx6k@einstein.dilieto.eu> Message-ID: <20200424152143.45b838c3@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 15:20:19 +0200 Fabrice Fontaine wrote: > > I propose making BR2_PACKAGE_UACME_UALPN depend on !BR2_PACKAGE_MBEDTLS. > > Would that be acceptable? > I think it should depend on !BR2_PACKAGE_UACME_MBEDTLS (added by the > second patch of this serie). > Otherwise, a user won't be able to select ualpn with a gnutls-enabled > uacme if he has also enabled mbedlts for an other purpose. Or instead make sure ualpn can be enabled only if either gnutls or openssl are available, and tweak the .mk file to use gnutls or openssl instead of mbedtls when ualpn is enabled. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com