Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mfgtools: bump to version 1.3.154
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 14:53:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520125301.GA1380486@p1g2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200413214249.206017-1-joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>

Hi Jorg,

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:42:49PM +0200, J?rg Krause wrote:
> The version 0.02 was a pre-release and is dated from Nov 20, 2017.
> 
> Meanwhile:
>  * the repo owner switch to NXPmicro
>  * latest version is 1.3.154
>  * the build system is CMake
>  * the license is BSD-3 only
>  * update the license hash as the copyright year and the owner has
>    changed
>  * drop the readme.txt file as is outdated
>  * drop patch, which is not needed with the new version
>  * update dependencies
> 
> Note, that mfgtools uses git to define a version string `GIT_VERSION`.
> It does so even when building from a source tarball (automatically
> generated by github). The problem is, that git provides the version
> information of Buildroot and mfgtools uses this version information to
> do a runtime check to detect outdated command list scripts.

Actually in latest release, the tarball generated includes a
.tarball-version file that includes the proper revision.
It is supported since 1.3.169, which is considered "pre-release" as it
isn't used in a GA BSP yet, but I think that feature is interesting
enough to bump the package already.

> We use a hook which the version generation script provides to write the
> correct version string.
> 
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
> ---
> v3:
>  * bump to latest version 1.3.154
>  * adapt version string hook to changes done upstream
>  * add optional host OpenSSL dependency to add support for https
>    download (introduced in 1.3.102)

I'm confused I thought we agreed that it'd be best to keep mgftools
as-is and only create a new "uuu" or "imx-uuu" package not to break
compatibility with people using the mfgtools v2? [1]
Has there been a new development in that discussion?

Regards,
Gary

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20200109191020.1282319-2-joerg.krause at embedded.rocks/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-20 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-13 21:42 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mfgtools: bump to version 1.3.154 Jörg Krause
2020-05-19 21:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-05-19 21:23   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-05-20 12:53 ` Gary Bisson [this message]
2020-05-25  8:11   ` Jörg Krause

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200520125301.GA1380486@p1g2 \
    --to=gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox