From: Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mfgtools: bump to version 1.3.154
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 14:53:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520125301.GA1380486@p1g2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200413214249.206017-1-joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
Hi Jorg,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:42:49PM +0200, J?rg Krause wrote:
> The version 0.02 was a pre-release and is dated from Nov 20, 2017.
>
> Meanwhile:
> * the repo owner switch to NXPmicro
> * latest version is 1.3.154
> * the build system is CMake
> * the license is BSD-3 only
> * update the license hash as the copyright year and the owner has
> changed
> * drop the readme.txt file as is outdated
> * drop patch, which is not needed with the new version
> * update dependencies
>
> Note, that mfgtools uses git to define a version string `GIT_VERSION`.
> It does so even when building from a source tarball (automatically
> generated by github). The problem is, that git provides the version
> information of Buildroot and mfgtools uses this version information to
> do a runtime check to detect outdated command list scripts.
Actually in latest release, the tarball generated includes a
.tarball-version file that includes the proper revision.
It is supported since 1.3.169, which is considered "pre-release" as it
isn't used in a GA BSP yet, but I think that feature is interesting
enough to bump the package already.
> We use a hook which the version generation script provides to write the
> correct version string.
>
> Signed-off-by: J?rg Krause <joerg.krause@embedded.rocks>
> ---
> v3:
> * bump to latest version 1.3.154
> * adapt version string hook to changes done upstream
> * add optional host OpenSSL dependency to add support for https
> download (introduced in 1.3.102)
I'm confused I thought we agreed that it'd be best to keep mgftools
as-is and only create a new "uuu" or "imx-uuu" package not to break
compatibility with people using the mfgtools v2? [1]
Has there been a new development in that discussion?
Regards,
Gary
[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20200109191020.1282319-2-joerg.krause at embedded.rocks/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-13 21:42 [Buildroot] [PATCH v3 1/1] package/mfgtools: bump to version 1.3.154 Jörg Krause
2020-05-19 21:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-05-19 21:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-05-20 12:53 ` Gary Bisson [this message]
2020-05-25 8:11 ` Jörg Krause
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200520125301.GA1380486@p1g2 \
--to=gary.bisson@boundarydevices.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox