From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] ebtables and musl
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 14:43:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200613144325.6c88eb8d@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200613132317.4edb7676@gmx.net>
Hello Markus,
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 13:23:17 +0200, Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hello Markus,
>
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:10:28 -0700, Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I see this patch in Buildroot:
> > http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2017-February/184225.html
> >
> > However, I am still running into the issue it is supposed to fix.
> >
> > This is with musl-1.2.0, the latest and greatest. I'm no longer stuck
> > with the ancient libmusl that caused issues with procps. It doesn't
> > seem to help with ebtables, though.
> >
> > /mnt/disk1/Development/br-musl/output/arm64/host/bin/aarch64-linux-gcc
> > -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Os
> > -fPIC -O3 -DPROGVERSION=\"2.0.10-4\" -DPROGNAME=\"ebtables\"
> > -DPROGDATE=\"December\ 2011\" -D_PATH_ETHERTYPES=\"/etc/ethertypes\"
> > -DEBTD_ARGC_MAX=50 -DEBTD_CMDLINE_MAXLN=2048
> > -DLOCKFILE=\"/var/lib/ebtables/lock\" -DLOCKDIR=\"/var/lib/ebtables/\"
> > -c -o extensions/ebt_802_3.o extensions/ebt_802_3.c -Iinclude/
> > In file included from include/linux/netfilter_bridge.h:8:0,
> > from include/linux/netfilter_bridge/ebtables.h:17,
> > from include/ebtables_u.h:28,
> > from useful_functions.c:25:
> > include/linux/if_ether.h:119:8: error: redefinition of 'struct ethhdr'
> > struct ethhdr {
> > ^~~~~~
> > In file included from
> > ../../host/aarch64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/usr/include/netinet/ether.h:8:0,
> > from include/ebtables_u.h:27,
> > from useful_functions.c:25:
> > ../../host/aarch64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/usr/include/netinet/if_ether.h:113:8:
> > note: originally defined here
> > struct ethhdr {
> > ^~~~~~
> > Makefile:78: recipe for target 'useful_functions.o' failed
> > make[2]: *** [useful_functions.o] Error 1
> > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> >
> > I am not quite sure what to make of it yet.
> >
> > Is it cause by the fact that include/linux/if_ether.h defines
> >
> > #ifndef _LINUX_IF_ETHER_H
> > #define _LINUX_IF_ETHER_H
> >
> > but include/netinet/if_ether.h defines
> >
> > #ifndef _NETINET_IF_ETHER_H
> > #define _NETINET_IF_ETHER_H
> >
> > and they both end up being included?
> >
> > $ find . -name if_ether.h -ls
> > 6025818 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 mmayer mmayer 1506 May 26
> > 16:30 ./build/linux-custom/include/linux/if_ether.h
> > 6028683 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 mmayer mmayer 7461 May 26
> > 16:30 ./build/linux-custom/include/uapi/linux/if_ether.h
> > 6047054 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 mmayer mmayer 5751 Dec 15
> > 2011 ./build/ebtables-2.0.10-4/include/linux/if_ether.h
> > 5934557 8 -rw-r--r-- 1 mmayer mmayer 7016 Jun 10
> > 16:52 ./host/aarch64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/usr/include/linux/if_ether.h
> > 5935035 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 mmayer mmayer 3625 Jun 10
> > 16:52 ./host/aarch64-buildroot-linux-musl/sysroot/usr/include/netinet/if_ether.h
> >
> > Also, there's five different copies of if_ether.h floating around.
>
> Care to provide a config/defconfig file for the failure (and provide the
> used buildroot version)?
Or did your use an external toolchain?
The patch states ([1]):
Upstream status: not upstreamable; depends on Buildroot local musl patch
Regards,
Peter
[1] https://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/tree/package/ebtables/0002-Fix-musl-compatibility.patch#n11
>
> >
> > While we are on the topic of ebtables, why is buildroot still using
> > v2.0.10-4 from 2014 when there is 2.0.11 from 2019 (as per
> > http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/ebtables/)? Is it just a matter of
> > submitting a patch to update it or is there an underlying reason to
> > keep the old version around?
>
> Probably not, care to send an ebtables update patch?
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Markus
> > _______________________________________________
> > buildroot mailing list
> > buildroot at busybox.net
> > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-13 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-12 20:10 [Buildroot] ebtables and musl Markus Mayer
2020-06-13 11:23 ` Peter Seiderer
2020-06-13 12:43 ` Peter Seiderer [this message]
2020-06-13 17:35 ` Markus Mayer
2020-06-14 3:00 ` Baruch Siach
2020-06-14 3:34 ` Markus Mayer
2020-06-14 21:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2020-06-15 3:03 ` Markus Mayer
2020-06-15 3:55 ` Baruch Siach
2020-06-15 23:02 ` Markus Mayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200613144325.6c88eb8d@gmx.net \
--to=ps.report@gmx.net \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox