From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:20:01 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/gst1-plugins-bayer2rgb-neon: bump to 0.4 In-Reply-To: <20200702083619.737-1-eloi.bail@savoirfairelinux.com> References: <20200702083619.737-1-eloi.bail@savoirfairelinux.com> Message-ID: <20200712232001.609f3b61@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:36:19 +0200 Eloi Bail wrote: > Bump gst1-plugins-bayer2rgb-neon to 0.4. > > Signed-off-by: Eloi Bail I've applied, but there's something odd that caught my eye. See below. > -GST1_PLUGINS_BAYER2RGB_NEON_VERSION = 0.3 > -GST1_PLUGINS_BAYER2RGB_NEON_SOURCE = gst-bayer2rgb-neon-v$(GST1_PLUGINS_BAYER2RGB_NEON_VERSION).tar.bz2 > +GST1_PLUGINS_BAYER2RGB_NEON_VERSION = 0.4 > +GST1_PLUGINS_BAYER2RGB_NEON_SOURCE = gst-bayer2rgb-neon-$(GST1_PLUGINS_BAYER2RGB_NEON_VERSION).tar.bz2 So your change the SOURCE variable to drop the "v", so I wondered why and looked at https://git.phytec.de/gst-bayer2rgb-neon/. The tag was v0.3 and the new tag is still v0.4. But the snapshot tarball name doesn't have the "v", for both the 0.3 and 0.4 versions. But still the v0.3.tar.gz download that we had until now worked fine. This puzzles me quite a bit. Especially since the download *without* the v as you're doing for 0.4 also works. So I've applied your patch but I'm quite puzzled by this difference between the tag name and the snapshot tarball name, and how it can work with v0.3. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com