From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 22:40:44 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 1/3] package/ima-evm-utils: fix build on musl In-Reply-To: <20200723200457.3996-1-petr.vorel@gmail.com> References: <20200723200457.3996-1-petr.vorel@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20200723224044.3dc2fefe@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 22:04:55 +0200 Petr Vorel wrote: > Fixes: > br-arm-cortex-a9-musl [ 7/44]: FAILED > br-i386-pentium-mmx-musl [12/44]: FAILED > br-x86-64-musl [34/44]: FAILED > linaro-aarch64 [36/44]: FAILED > > Fix will be released in future release (after 1.3), but was needed since > initial release. > > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel Why don't we have autobuilder failures ? If you look at: http://autobuild.buildroot.net/index.php?libc=musl&symbols%5BBR2_PACKAGE_IMA_EVM_UTILS%5D=y you will see that we have plenty of builds that succeed, with BR2_PACKAGE_IMA_EVM_UTILS=y, with musl toolchains. Notes: - There are failures above, but none of them are due to ima-evm-utils. You can also look at http://autobuild.buildroot.net/?reason=ima-evm-utils% which shows we never had a single build failure caused by this package (it seems). - The above URL is slow to load, please give it some time, the SQL query is slow! Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com