From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/minetest: don't depend on luajit
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 13:48:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200728134847.5f7e7401@windsurf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADvTj4q1DeWEpAcpkOsg9GA_dhzogRFV00sMd6YrdzpVMqU0pA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 04:17:26 -0600
James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 1:09 AM Thomas Petazzoni
> <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:56:21 -0600
> > James Hilliard <james.hilliard1@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Since minetest has a fallback to a bundled lua when luajit is not
> > > available we don't need to depend on luajit or any lua version at all.
> >
> > In general, I think we try to not use bundled libraries even when they
> > exist. If minetest needs a Lua interpreter, it should always use an
> > external Lua interpreter, I believe.
> From my understanding luajit is the only supported external lua
> interpreter for minetest. So I think it makes sense to not require
> a specific lua interpreter for flexibility.
I don't understand your reply, as I was not talking about using other
Lua interpreters.
What I'm saying is that if minetest has a mandatory dependency on
LuaJIT, then it should *always* use the external LuaJIT and never use
the bundled one. We prefer external libraries over bundled libraries in
general in the context of Buildroot.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-28 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-27 20:56 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/minetest: don't depend on luajit James Hilliard
2020-07-28 7:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-07-28 10:17 ` James Hilliard
2020-07-28 11:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2020-07-28 19:36 ` Yann E. MORIN
2020-07-28 20:44 ` James Hilliard
2020-07-28 21:47 ` Romain Naour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200728134847.5f7e7401@windsurf.home \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox