From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 22:47:35 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Revert "toolchain/toolchain-buildroot: enable uclibc for riscv64" In-Reply-To: <20200815203014.GA24264@scaer> References: <20200815141039.4774-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> <20200815203014.GA24264@scaer> Message-ID: <20200815224735.6cccee26@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Yann, On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 22:30:14 +0200 "Yann E. MORIN" wrote: > Applied to master, thanks. > > OTOH, I was wondering why we were not adding an exclusion in the > genrandconfig script, like we do for all the other libffi limitations... Our libffi exclusions in genrandconfig are really when there is no support for a given CPU architecture in libffi. In the situation we're talking about, libffi does have support for RISC-V 64-bit. The limitation is not in libffi, but in uClibc-ng. We could certainly have handled that by an autobuilder exception, but I've never been a big fan of such autobuilder exceptions. That being said, if the general feeling is that an autobuilder exception is a better way of avoiding those build failures, I'm fine with changing to that solution. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com