From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: add ipcalc at version 1.0.0
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:40:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201014134053.06a0a622@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201014005921.27623-1-derrick@meter.com>
Hello Derrick,
Thanks for your contribution! It looks mostly good, I only have a few
comments. First, the commit title we like to have for commits
introducing new packages is just:
package/ipcalc: new package
See below for more comments.
On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:59:21 +0000
Derrick Lyndon Pallas <derrick@meter.com> wrote:
> package/Config.in | 1 +
> package/ipcalc/0001-disable-man-build.patch | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++
> package/ipcalc/Config.in | 7 +++++
> package/ipcalc/ipcalc.hash | 3 ++
> package/ipcalc/ipcalc.mk | 17 +++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
Could you add an entry in the DEVELOPERS file for this package?
> diff --git a/package/Config.in b/package/Config.in
> index 09a332e3b9..56508bbc46 100644
> --- a/package/Config.in
> +++ b/package/Config.in
> @@ -1702,6 +1702,7 @@ menu "Networking"
> source "package/gupnp-dlna/Config.in"
> source "package/ibrcommon/Config.in"
> source "package/ibrdtn/Config.in"
> + source "package/ipcalc/Config.in"
It seems like you have added ipcalc under Libraries -> Networking,
which I guess isn't really appropriate as it's not a library. Perhaps
in "Networking applications" it would make more sense ?
> diff --git a/package/ipcalc/0001-disable-man-build.patch b/package/ipcalc/0001-disable-man-build.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..767b78162a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/ipcalc/0001-disable-man-build.patch
Could you rework this patch so that it has a proper description and
Signed-off-by line? It should also be generated using git format-patch,
and considering what it does, it should definitely be submitted
upstream.
> diff --git a/package/ipcalc/Config.in b/package/ipcalc/Config.in
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..74cf84f4a4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/ipcalc/Config.in
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_IPCALC
> + bool "ipcalc"
Have you tested this package using our ./utils/test-pkg utility? This
typically allows to detect if your package has dependencies on some
specific toolchain features that would need to be expressed here.
Other than those relatively small details, it looks very good. Could
you adjust the patch, and send a new iteration?
Thanks a lot!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-14 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-14 0:59 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: add ipcalc at version 1.0.0 Derrick Lyndon Pallas
2020-10-14 11:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2020-10-14 18:30 ` Derrick Pallas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-13 22:23 Derrick Pallas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201014134053.06a0a622@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox