From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 23:33:51 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/rt-tests: fix build issue for unsupported architectures In-Reply-To: <20201103220454.12557-1-heiko.thiery@gmail.com> References: <20201103220454.12557-1-heiko.thiery@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20201103223351.GN2887157@scaer> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Heiko, All, On 2020-11-03 23:04 +0100, Heiko Thiery spake thusly: > Release v1.9 introduced the oslat tool that only builds for supported > architectures (i386, x86_64, PPC64) and leads to a build failure for the > whole suite. An upstream patch changes this build error to a runtime warning. > > Fixes: > - http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/72322cf7239a91211b0be74c01b55873340763f8 > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Thiery Applied to master, thanks. Regards, Yann E. MORIN. > --- > ...-Allow-build-for-not-supported-archs.patch | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 package/rt-tests/0002-rt-tests-oslat-Allow-build-for-not-supported-archs.patch > > diff --git a/package/rt-tests/0002-rt-tests-oslat-Allow-build-for-not-supported-archs.patch b/package/rt-tests/0002-rt-tests-oslat-Allow-build-for-not-supported-archs.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..96b36d60dd > --- /dev/null > +++ b/package/rt-tests/0002-rt-tests-oslat-Allow-build-for-not-supported-archs.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > +From 165b597e3003c6870f5980e8902014d9344e6cf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From: Peter Xu > +Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:47:26 -0400 > +Subject: [PATCH] rt-tests: oslat: Allow build for not supported archs > + > +Now rt-tests won't build for archs other than x86/i386/ppc64 after oslat is > +merged. Instead of failing the build, let's make it pass. However, whenever > +oslat is executed, instead of running the real program, dump an error message, > +so that people can try to implement the frc() function for it when there's a > +real need for the new arch. > + > +Signed-off-by: Peter Xu > +Signed-off-by: John Kacur > + > +[Taken from: > +https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/rt-tests/rt-tests.git/commit/src/oslat/oslat.c?h=unstable/devel/latest&id=165b597e3003c6870f5980e8902014d9344e6cf3] > +Signed-off-by: Heiko Thiery > +--- > + src/oslat/oslat.c | 10 +++++++++- > + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > + > +diff --git a/src/oslat/oslat.c b/src/oslat/oslat.c > +index f1a82f2..a8b6155 100644 > +--- a/src/oslat/oslat.c > ++++ b/src/oslat/oslat.c > +@@ -69,7 +69,9 @@ static inline void frc(uint64_t *pval) > + __asm__ __volatile__("mfspr %0, 268\n" : "=r" (*pval)); > + } > + # else > +-# error Need frc() for this platform. > ++# define relax() do { } while (0) > ++# define frc(x) > ++# define FRC_MISSING > + # endif > + #else > + # error Need to add support for this compiler. > +@@ -810,6 +812,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > + int i, n_cores; > + cpu_set_t cpu_set; > + > ++#ifdef FRC_MISSING > ++ printf("This architecture is not yet supported. " > ++ "Please implement frc() function first for %s.\n", argv[0]); > ++ return 0; > ++#endif > ++ > + CPU_ZERO(&cpu_set); > + > + g.app_name = argv[0]; > +-- > +2.20.1 > + > -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot at busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'