From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Seiderer Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 19:42:19 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Your daily results for 2020-12-06 In-Reply-To: <20201207101650.4aaf5988@windsurf.home> References: <23e2d4ac-27ba-3967-36da-d1ae1ddfa050@inbox.ru> <20201207101650.4aaf5988@windsurf.home> Message-ID: <20201207194219.507e55af@gmx.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Maxim, Thomas, On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 10:16:50 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:56:24 +0300 > Maxim Kochetkov wrote: > > > TimescaleDB have no PostgreSQL 13 support right now. > > > > https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt > > > > # Ensure that PostgreSQL version is supported and consistent > > # with src/compat.h version check > > if ((${PG_VERSION_MAJOR} LESS "11") OR > > (${PG_VERSION_MAJOR} GREATER "12")) > > message(FATAL_ERROR "TimescaleDB only supports PostgreSQL 11 and 12") > > endif() > > Then, how do we proceed, since timescaledb requires PostgreSQL, but > Buildroot now uses PostgreSQL 13 ? Should we drop timescaledb ? Under > what time frame does the timescaledb project intends to support > PostgreSQL 13 ? There is apparently a pull request opened at > https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/pull/2498. No urgent demand for the postgresql update from my side (as the 12.x version is still supported with updates) in case timescaledb will not provide an update in the near future (and the pull request is to voluminous for an backport)... Regards, Peter > > Thomas