From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Seiderer Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 20:00:46 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH/next v1] package/mfgtools: bump version to uuu_1.4.43 In-Reply-To: References: <20201201203102.29535-1-ps.report@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20201207200046.0c9fbbdd@gmx.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Gary, J?rg, On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:06:55 +0100, Gary Bisson wrote: > Hi Peter, > > First, sorry for the delay, it's been a crazy week. > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 09:31:02PM +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote: > > - remove dependency on BR2_arm > > - update Config.in.host help text (mention NXP, mention uuu) > > - change upstream URL to https://github.com/NXPmicro/mfgtools (as > > https://github.com/codeauroraforum/mfgtools redirects to it) > > - remove legacy patch 0001-lnx_def.h-fix-conflicting-declaration-of-__time64_t.patch > > - remove legacy readme.txt > > - update licence and LICENSE hash > > - remove legacy README.txt license hash > > - use upload tar.gz archive > > - add new dependencies: host-pkgconf host-bzip2 host-libzip > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer > > --- > > Notes: > > - @Gary Bisson: as it seems a complete rewrite of the tool > > (compared to the old mfgtoolcli) and you provided an > > fix for the old one lately: does it make sense to update/overwrite > > the mfgtools package or should I provide the uuu tool as a > > new package (any naming suggestions)? > > Yes actually there's been a lot of discussion about that one already: > - First I did a patch similar as yours that was rejected not to remove > the legacy mfgtools package [1]. The naming suggested was "imx-uuu" > - Then Jorg did offer some patches to add "imx-uuu" [2] > -> not sure why this one is marked as superseded? > -> all I remember is that the second patch of that series wasn't > accepted as we agreed in [1] that mfgtools should stay as legacy as > long as it builds basically. Sorry for missing the previous patches/discussion (and inventing the the same/similar patch set again ;-))... Package name imx-uuu seems reasonable (despite the name of the git repository)... > > So adding Jorg to this thread to figure out which is the best imx-uuu > package. My only remark on Jorg package is that the Kconfig comment > talks about UTP whereas UTP was for mfgtools (first of its name) whereas > UUU only uses SDP to load binaries into RAM and then fastboot to flash. Will try to re-spin a new patch set based on yours/J?rg work... Regards, Peter > > Regards, > Gary > > [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20190608105337.19879-1-bisson.gary at gmail.com/ > [2] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20200109191020.1282319-1-joerg.krause at embedded.rocks/