Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2, 1/1] toolchain/toolchain-wrapper: fix gcc -v with relro
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 18:09:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201225170955.GA1680670@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201224101840.3428243-1-fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>

Fabrice, All,

On 2020-12-24 11:18 +0100, Fabrice Fontaine spake thusly:
> rhash in version 1.4.0 with relro fails to build because gcc -v raises
> the following build failure:
> 
> /data/buildroot-test/instance-1/output-1/host/mips64el-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/soft-float/el/usr/lib64/Scrt1.o: In function `__start':
> (.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> Run result: 1
> 
> This build failure is raised because the toolchain-wrapper calls gcc with
> -Wl,-z,relro and as a result gcc wrongly assumes that some linking must
> be done.

Although I do undesrstand the problem, I am not sure this is a good
solution.

Indeed, it is perfectly legit to call gcc -v while doing an acutal
compile or link:

    $ echo 'main() { return 0; }' |gcc -v -Wl,-z,relro -o ess -x c -

Indeed, using -v is a good way to see the actual programs gcc calls in
the various steps, and has already helped me debug some difficult
issues...

So, I think we need to be a little bit smarter in how we detect whether
an actual link is attempted. It is however not trivial to come up with
such a heuristic.

But it might be simpler to "fix" rhash itself, with something like:

    diff -durN rhash-1.4.0.orig/configure rhash-1.4.0/configure
    --- rhash-1.4.0.orig/configure2020-07-14 21:35: 11.000000000 +0200
    +++ rhash-1.4.0/configure2020-12-25 18:07:15.52 9581029 +0100
    @@ -513,8 +513,13 @@
       CC_TMP="$CC"
       test -n "$OPT_CC" && OTHER_CC= || OTHER_CC="gcc cc"
       for CC in "$CC_TMP" $OTHER_CC; do
    +    cc_name_tmp=
         if run_cmd "$CC -v"; then
           cc_name_tmp=$($CC -v 2>&1 | tail -n 1 | cut -d ' ' -f 1)
    +    elif run_cmd "$CC --version"; then
    +      cc_name_tmp=$($CC --version 2>&1 | head -n 1 | cut -d ' ' -f 1)
    +    fi
    +    if test "${cc_name_tmp}"; then
           if test "$cc_name_tmp" = "gcc"; then
             cc_name=$cc_name_tmp
             start_check "$CC version"

This should also be hopefully accpetable upstream (too bad they do not
want to switch a common, well-known buildsystem, and that the cmake
suppot has languished without any comment for more than a year now...)

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

> Fixes:
>  - http://autobuild.buildroot.org/results/8605c16cc28316954ce8b9dcc266974390c5da20
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fontaine.fabrice@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
> ---
> Changes v1 -> v2 (after review of Peter Seiderer):
>  - Fix typos in commit log and update comment in source code
> 
>  toolchain/toolchain-wrapper.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/toolchain/toolchain-wrapper.c b/toolchain/toolchain-wrapper.c
> index 0fb6064b1c..2a7dd61729 100644
> --- a/toolchain/toolchain-wrapper.c
> +++ b/toolchain/toolchain-wrapper.c
> @@ -453,10 +453,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  			*cur++ = "-pie";
>  	}
>  #endif
> -	/* Are we building the Linux Kernel or U-Boot? */
> +	/* Are we building the Linux Kernel or U-Boot or displaying the programs invoked by the compiler? */
>  	for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
>  		if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-D__KERNEL__") ||
> -		    !strcmp(argv[i], "-D__UBOOT__"))
> +		    !strcmp(argv[i], "-D__UBOOT__") ||
> +		    !strcmp(argv[i], "-v"))
>  			break;
>  	}
>  	if (i == argc) {
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-25 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-24 10:18 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2, 1/1] toolchain/toolchain-wrapper: fix gcc -v with relro Fabrice Fontaine
2020-12-25 17:09 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2020-12-25 21:16   ` Fabrice Fontaine
2020-12-25 21:41     ` Yann E. MORIN
2020-12-25 22:38 ` Yann E. MORIN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201225170955.GA1680670@scaer \
    --to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox