From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] package/dotnet: add host-dotnet-sdk
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 08:58:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210104085858.68f57652@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABWPoFG8k9WccFXRKC6ufRLKDHzdwCyeN3Q1PJZzqpg83fwc1w@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Raul,
On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:26:32 +0100
Raul Hidalgo Caballero <deinok@deinok.com> wrote:
> This adds host-dotnet-sdk , for now it only works on x86_64 but it could
> also work for armv5 and aarch64 (Will be done in the future).
>
> Notice that to build dotnet, you need a working dotnet. This is the reason
> for host is just downloading and extracting a precompiled one
Thanks for your contribution!
The first comment is that your patch only adds host-dotnet-sdk, and we
separately had a patch in September 2020 from Andrey Nechypurenko
adding the dotnet-runtime. My understanding is that in fact both are
needed to have complete .NET support in Buildroot: host-dotnet-sdk to
get the compiler on the host machine, and dotnet-runtime to have the
runtime on the target. Is this correct ? If that's the case, then it
would be good to have both patches together in the same series, as well
as a simple test case in support/testing/ that shows it working (we can
provide some help and hints on how to achieve that).
Andrey said he would come up within a new iteration, but I don't think
he has posted any new version in the last few months.
Another comment is that when sending a patch, you should use "git
send-email" so that the patch appears inline, and we can review it
properly. See https://git-send-email.io/. I'm going to copy/paste your
patch below to give some comments. Overall it looks very good, so only
a few small comments here and there.
> From 438c148bbd052a72c39a0e8345ed0e98f00b5044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Raul Hidalgo Caballero <deinok@deinok.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 17:04:36 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] package/dotnet: add host-dotnet-sdk
The commit title should be:
package/dotnet-sdk: new package
>
> Signed-off-by: Raul Hidalgo Caballero <deinok@deinok.com>
> ---
> package/Config.in.host | 1 +
> package/dotnet-sdk/dotnet-sdk.hash | 3 +++
> package/dotnet-sdk/dotnet-sdk.mk | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> package/dotnet/Config.in.host | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 38 insertions(+)
You should add an entry in the DEVELOPERS file for this package.
> index 0000000000..714b36c518
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/dotnet-sdk/dotnet-sdk.hash
> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> +sha256 cfc21f5e8bd655ae997eec916138b707b1d290b83272c02a95c9f821b8c87310 LICENSE.txt
> +sha256 01564961f8ca9744d0ecc5d3e72d7c1659df95898f3a077fd9140fd4023f3579 ThirdPartyNotices.txt
> +sha256 23df1eca7eb1302dfb10f4edce7edf7150e57698576f61b2dcb777c833cbd80c dotnet-sdk-5.0.101-linux-x64.tar.gz
Fields in the hash file should be separated with just two spaces.
> +define HOST_DOTNET_SDK_INSTALL_CMDS
> + (mkdir -p $(HOST_DIR)/usr/share/dotnet/)
> + (cp -R $(@D)/* $(HOST_DIR)/usr/share/dotnet/)
> + (ln -s $(HOST_DIR)/usr/share/dotnet/dotnet $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin/dotnet)
> +endef
You don't need spaces around those commands. Also, instead of cp -R, we
normally use "cp -dpfr". Also $(HOST_DIR)/usr doesn't really exist,
it's a symlink to $(HOST_DIR). And also perhaps make the link a
relative symlink ?
So:
mkdir -p $(HOST_DIR)/share/dotnet
cp -dpfr $(@D)/* $(HOST_DIR)/share/dotnet
(cd $(HOST_DIR)/bin; ln -s ../share/donet/dotnet)
Do you think you could rework your patch, and perhaps adopt the
dotnet-runtime patch in the same series so that we have a complete
solution ?
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-12 16:26 [Buildroot] package/dotnet: add host-dotnet-sdk Raul Hidalgo Caballero
2021-01-04 7:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2021-01-04 8:53 ` Andrey Nechypurenko
2021-01-07 22:52 ` Raul Hidalgo Caballero
2021-01-08 12:01 ` Andrey Nechypurenko
2021-01-11 11:50 ` Raul Hidalgo Caballero
2021-01-12 9:09 ` Raul Hidalgo Caballero
2021-01-12 14:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-01-12 15:08 ` Raul Hidalgo Caballero
2021-01-19 9:23 ` Raul Hidalgo Caballero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210104085858.68f57652@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox