From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:03:47 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v1 2/2] package/libcamera-apps: new package In-Reply-To: <20210131234844.537ed0c1@gmx.net> References: <20210129230418.26359-1-ps.report@gmx.net> <20210129230418.26359-3-ps.report@gmx.net> <20210131232048.1bfc2944@windsurf.home> <20210131234844.537ed0c1@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20210201090347.668500e9@windsurf.home> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Peter, On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:48:44 +0100 Peter Seiderer wrote: > > Loooots of patches. I suppose you submitted them upstream already ? > > Yes, see [1]...., and more patches to come to fix test-pkg failures... Great! > > To be honest, I am wondering if we shouldn't do a "depends on > > BR2_PACKAGE_LIBCAMERA" to simplify this a bit. Indeed, if you want > > libcamera-apps, most likely you know you should enable libcamera as > > well. > > The experienced buildroot user will do...., but the average RPi user? Ah, but I now realize this libcamera-apps stuff is from the raspberrypi project, not from the libcamera project. Fair enough, my comment was not a very strong one, so I'm fine with a select of libcamera + propagation of dependencies, as you did. Thanks a lot! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com