From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann E. MORIN Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 11:19:39 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH-NEXT 2/4] package/linux-firmware.mk: get rid of temporary tarball for file installation In-Reply-To: <871rdke0kx.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <20210212184049.13202-1-peter@korsgaard.com> <20210212184049.13202-3-peter@korsgaard.com> <20210212203939.GK1679218@scaer> <87blcpezmw.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20210213083705.GO1679218@scaer> <875z2we1uy.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <20210213095154.GP1679218@scaer> <871rdke0kx.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <20210213101939.GS1679218@scaer> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Peter, All, On 2021-02-13 11:14 +0100, Peter Korsgaard spake thusly: > >>>>> "Yann" == Yann E MORIN writes: > >> >> Ok, so we need to stick a set -o pipefail before? > >> > I prefer if we could cleanup the install sequence, as I suggested and > >> > proposed in another reply. > >> Well, having our temporary tarball in the build directory is also kind > >> of ugly, but ok - Fine by me. > > That will not be worse than now: we already leave the temporary tarball > > in the build directory... > Yes, I know - Which was part of the reason for me wanting to change > it. But oh well, it is not a big deal. Ah, sorry, I miss-read that part, then... But as I said in the commit log of that proposal of mine, I don't see how we can do it easily without a tarball... But if you think of a better alternative, I'm all ears^Weyes. ;-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'