From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2021-03-03
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 23:26:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304222634.GP2275@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304224926.45aa4056@windsurf.home>
Thomas, All,
On 2021-03-04 22:49 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> > riscv64 | fuse-overlayfs-1.4.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/cfef18f3adf51edaedbbd193efbff19aebdfe508 |
>
> This is a bug in uClibc: it implements renameat() only if the
> SYS_renameat system call exists. If only the SYS_renameat2 system call
> exists, the renameat() function is not implemented. Musl does this
> correctly:
>
> int renameat(int oldfd, const char *old, int newfd, const char *new)
> {
> #ifdef SYS_renameat
> return syscall(SYS_renameat, oldfd, old, newfd, new);
> #else
> return syscall(SYS_renameat2, oldfd, old, newfd, new, 0);
> #endif
> }
>
> uclibc needs to be patched here.
But what about external toolchains? We can't know whether they would
carry such a patch or not...
> > aarch64 | host-sentry-cli-1.57.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/739d625673f9b2ce2d915ecdc21910c62618d145 |
> > microblazeel | host-sentry-cli-1.57.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b1779a7d46f6ee9c06864c3ca252f1cdad47cf08 |
> > i586 | host-sentry-cli-1.57.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a5fe402e3f4e538eb4584f345b029ef12ad43348 |
> > arc | host-sentry-cli-1.57.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/abd3f886335f146ff6f16370484106bd8a205bda |
> What do we do with this? The only way to solve that is to have the
> Cargo vendoring support, which we won't have for 2021.02. Should we
> drop this package ?
I am all in favour of dropping sentry-cli. It is a host-only package
with no in-tree users. When it was submitted, no rationale was given to
justify for having it upstream (although I suspect it may be helpfull
with traces generated with sentry-native).
In any case, this package is not playing nice with our infra, and our
infra is not ready to accomodate such a package yet.
Let's drop it for now...
Since you have it in your vendoring branch, you can still keep uisng it
to validate your code.
> > nios2 | libgeos-3.9.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a05fdf1958f93a206c5c66c7f636b6650683626d | ORPH
> Some more nios2 toolchain issue.
> Should we get rid of nios2 support entirely ?
How prevalent is nios2? What's the support in the kernel? Some time ago,
quite a few old architectures were dropped; IIR, a few others were put
on trial to see if they were really still alive (but apart an LWN
article https://lwn.net/Articles/748074/ I can't find that list...)
> > arm | toolchain-external-linaro-a... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d9b9a4b7c3660bd730a19ab09e44f24bc29e3f40 | ORPH
> > arm | toolchain-external-linaro-a... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/13f9a551f5ac911e7daa2a382b0683d81486cffa | ORPH
> toolchain is gone ?
I can get it from here;
wget 'https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz'
--2021-03-04 23:03:07-- https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz
Resolving releases.linaro.org (releases.linaro.org)...
52.215.200.125
Connecting to releases.linaro.org (releases.linaro.org)|52.215.200.125|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
Location: https://publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com/releases/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz?Signature=qIOVqoIXcsiFVTalQoTG%2FdNwu9A%3D&Expires=1614895479&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIELXV2RYNAHFUP7A [following]
--2021-03-04 23:03:09-- https://publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com/releases/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz?Signature=qIOVqoIXcsiFVTalQoTG%2FdNwu9A%3D&Expires=1614895479&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIELXV2RYNAHFUP7A
Resolving publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com (publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com)... 52.218.41.226
Connecting to publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com (publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com)|52.218.41.226|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 107031352 (102M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: ?gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz?
gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x 100%[=====================================>] 102.07M 17.0MB/s in 5.8s
2021-03-04 23:03:15 (17.5 MB/s) - ?gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz? saved [107031352/107031352]
Temporary glitch in the network? Goblins? ;-)
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-04 8:15 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Daily results for 2021-03-03 Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-04 21:49 ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build " Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-04 22:26 ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2021-03-05 8:01 ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 8:36 ` Peter Korsgaard
2021-03-05 7:56 ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 8:55 ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 9:13 ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 9:22 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-05 16:01 ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 16:13 ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 16:52 ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 9:48 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2021-03-05 15:10 ` Heiko Thiery
2021-03-05 15:14 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-05 15:38 ` Heiko Thiery
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210304222634.GP2275@scaer \
--to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox