Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2021-03-03
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 23:26:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304222634.GP2275@scaer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304224926.45aa4056@windsurf.home>

Thomas, All,

On 2021-03-04 22:49 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni spake thusly:
> >   riscv64    |      fuse-overlayfs-1.4.0      | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/cfef18f3adf51edaedbbd193efbff19aebdfe508 |     
> 
> This is a bug in uClibc: it implements renameat() only if the
> SYS_renameat system call exists. If only the SYS_renameat2 system call
> exists, the renameat() function is not implemented. Musl does this
> correctly:
> 
> int renameat(int oldfd, const char *old, int newfd, const char *new)
> {
> #ifdef SYS_renameat
>         return syscall(SYS_renameat, oldfd, old, newfd, new);
> #else
>         return syscall(SYS_renameat2, oldfd, old, newfd, new, 0);
> #endif
> }
> 
> uclibc needs to be patched here.

But what about external toolchains? We can't know whether they would
carry such a patch or not...

> >   aarch64    |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/739d625673f9b2ce2d915ecdc21910c62618d145 |     
> > microblazeel |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b1779a7d46f6ee9c06864c3ca252f1cdad47cf08 |     
> >     i586     |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a5fe402e3f4e538eb4584f345b029ef12ad43348 |     
> >     arc      |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/abd3f886335f146ff6f16370484106bd8a205bda |     
> What do we do with this? The only way to solve that is to have the
> Cargo vendoring support, which we won't have for 2021.02. Should we
> drop this package ?

I am all in favour of dropping sentry-cli. It is a host-only package
with no in-tree users. When it was submitted, no rationale was given to
justify for having it upstream (although I suspect it may be helpfull
with traces generated with sentry-native).

In any case, this package is not playing nice with our infra, and our
infra is not ready to accomodate such a package yet.

Let's drop it for now...

Since you have it in your vendoring branch, you can still keep uisng it
to validate your code.

> >    nios2     |         libgeos-3.9.0          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a05fdf1958f93a206c5c66c7f636b6650683626d | ORPH
> Some more nios2 toolchain issue.
> Should we get rid of nios2 support entirely ?

How prevalent is nios2? What's the support in the kernel? Some time ago,
quite a few old architectures were dropped; IIR, a few others were put
on trial to see if they were really still alive (but apart an LWN
article https://lwn.net/Articles/748074/ I can't find that list...)

> >     arm      | toolchain-external-linaro-a... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d9b9a4b7c3660bd730a19ab09e44f24bc29e3f40 | ORPH
> >     arm      | toolchain-external-linaro-a... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/13f9a551f5ac911e7daa2a382b0683d81486cffa | ORPH
> toolchain is gone ?

I can get it from here;

    wget 'https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz'
    --2021-03-04 23:03:07--  https://releases.linaro.org/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz
    Resolving releases.linaro.org (releases.linaro.org)...
    52.215.200.125
    Connecting to releases.linaro.org (releases.linaro.org)|52.215.200.125|:443... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Found
    Location: https://publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com/releases/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz?Signature=qIOVqoIXcsiFVTalQoTG%2FdNwu9A%3D&Expires=1614895479&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIELXV2RYNAHFUP7A [following]
    --2021-03-04 23:03:09--  https://publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com/releases/components/toolchain/binaries/7.3-2018.05/arm-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz?Signature=qIOVqoIXcsiFVTalQoTG%2FdNwu9A%3D&Expires=1614895479&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIELXV2RYNAHFUP7A
    Resolving publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com (publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com)... 52.218.41.226
    Connecting to publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com (publishing-ie-linaro-org.s3.amazonaws.com)|52.218.41.226|:443... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 107031352 (102M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: ?gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz?

    gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x 100%[=====================================>] 102.07M  17.0MB/s    in 5.8s

    2021-03-04 23:03:15 (17.5 MB/s) - ?gcc-linaro-7.3.1-2018.05-x86_64_arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz? saved [107031352/107031352]

Temporary glitch in the network? Goblins? ;-)

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

-- 
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 561 099 427 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  8:15 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Daily results for 2021-03-03 Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-04 21:49 ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build " Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-04 22:26   ` Yann E. MORIN [this message]
2021-03-05  8:01     ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  8:36     ` Peter Korsgaard
2021-03-05  7:56   ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  8:55     ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  9:13       ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  9:22     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-05 16:01       ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 16:13         ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 16:52           ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  9:48   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2021-03-05 15:10   ` Heiko Thiery
2021-03-05 15:14     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-05 15:38       ` Heiko Thiery

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210304222634.GP2275@scaer \
    --to=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox