From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Drew Fustini Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:27:03 -0700 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/4] Support for the Beagle-V platform In-Reply-To: <20210429074636.724046-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> References: <20210429074636.724046-1-thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> Message-ID: <20210430082703.GA139460@x1> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 09:46:31AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > The beta version of the Beagle-V RISC-V 64-bit platform has been > showing up at the front door of a few lucky people around the world in > the past days. Thank you for getting this posted so fast! The primary goal of our beta developer program for the BeagleV Starlight is to get the upstream process going so we are in a good position when the production board launches with distributors in September [1]. Anyone interested can join our public BeagleV forum to stay updated [2]. This is the first upstream patch series for BeagleV Starlight which made me realize I need to provide some clarification on naming guidance for the boards and SoCs. I have added a new section to the README [3]. Small nit for this cover letter is that it should be BeagleV instead of Beagle-V. But more importantly I want to make everyone aware that there there will eventually be two different BeagleV Starlight boards: - BeagleV Starlight board with StarFive JH7100 SoC (2x SiFive U74) - BeagleV Starlight board with StarFive JH7110 SoC (4x U74, PCIe, GPU) The board that a limited number of beta developers like Thomas have just received is the JH7100 version. Thank you, Drew Fustini BeagleBoard.org Foundation [1] https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglev-starlight [2] https://forum.beagleboard.org/c/beaglev [3] https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglev-starlight#guidance-on-naming-conventions